CamelHive
Production-readiness audit
Production-readiness audit
An honest audit of apps built with AI. Every result shows what it covers.
AI output is fast and fragile. CamelHive checks it against a public, versioned catalog, points to where each finding was seen, and reports what it could not determine instead of passing it.
Free scan, paid plans from $20/month, or a custom quote for an engineer-reviewed, signed attestation.
We don't grade the demo. We audit production readiness: we report, we do not fix.
AI-Generated MVP
- Fast
- Functional
- Fragile
What the audit reports
- Evidence
- Coverage
- Undetermined, never a pass
Engineering Scope
🔐 Security Checks
What we checkAI-generated code often ships without a security review.
The catalog covers these areas, each with its own rules.
We report what each check found, where it was seen, and what it could not verify. We audit; we do not fix the code or certify compliance.
- ✓Input validation & sanitization
- ✓Secrets management (hardcoded API keys)
- ✓Auth & session robustness
- ✓Role-based access control (RBAC)
- ✓Database permission tightening
- ✓API rate limiting
- ✓Encryption at rest and in transit
- ✓Logging for security events
- ✓Checks traceable to OWASP ASVS and CWE
- ✓Personal-data handling (GDPR/CCPA-relevant checks, not a compliance opinion)
Evidence, not opinion
Every finding points to where it was seen inside the frozen snapshot. What we cannot verify is reported as undetermined — never as a pass.
Verifiable. Not asserted.
We run this on ourselves
84.9/ 100
57/155 rules evaluated · Measured Oct 11, 2026
Engagement Fit
This is for
- ✓Founders with a live MVP
- ✓Runs today without excuses
- ✓1–3 real functional flows
- ✓Real backend with data persistence
- ✓Production intent — not experimentation
This is not for
- ✗Idea-stage or pre-backend projects
- ✗Mockups or no-code demos
- ✗Full products disguised as MVPs
- ✗Projects without production intent
Why CamelHive
We don't compete with AI. We audit what it builds.
Evidence, not opinion
Every finding points to where it was seen inside the frozen snapshot.
Abstention is a result
What we cannot verify is reported as undetermined, never as a pass.
A public, versioned catalog
Rule IDs are never renumbered or reused.
Human judgment, in Reviewed Attestation
Only the Reviewed Attestation plan has an engineer resolve what no model can. Scan, Audit and Audit Pro have no human review.
Pricing
Pick how much of the audit you want automated.
Coverage below is counted live from the rule catalog, not typed in by hand — if the catalog grows, the numbers do too.
Scan
Free
Structural checks only — no model in the loop, no cost.
26 of 184 rules evaluated
Structural scans, no model
Audit
$20/month
One model-driven pass, with an adversarial review before anything is accepted.
Up to 141 of 184 rules evaluated
1 agentic run/month
Audit Pro
$100/month
Same engine, more runs — track drift across a sprint, not just a single snapshot.
Up to 141 of 184 rules evaluated
4 agentic runs/month
Reviewed Attestation
Custom
An engineer resolves what no model can — judgment and runtime checks — and signs it.
Up to 184 of 184 rules evaluated
Quoted per engagement
"Up to" — an agentic run can abstain when there isn't enough evidence. An abstention is reported, never shown as a pass. Target spend, not a hard stop — an in-flight batch can't be interrupted mid-run, so actual spend can land a small, bounded amount over target.
"I could just ask ChatGPT."
Fair question. Here's what a chat window doesn't give you.
A versioned catalog
Rule ids that never get renumbered — a run today is comparable to one three months from now. A chat isn't reproducible even with itself.
Evidence, or it doesn't count
Every finding points to where it was seen in the snapshot. What we can't verify is reported as undetermined instead.
An adversarial second pass
Before a finding is accepted, a second pass tries to refute it first.
Declared coverage
We say exactly how many rules were evaluated, and which ones we couldn't.
A pinned, immutable snapshot
The report points to an exact commit SHA — re-verifiable, and diffable against your next run.
Entry Point
Not sure which plan fits? Let's talk.
Tell us about your MVP. We'll point you to the right plan — including whether a Reviewed Attestation is worth it for where you're at.
Already know what you want? Pick a plan above — this form works for any of them.
For agencies, freelancers & no-code builders
Your client asked what was checked. Now you can show them.
A CamelHive attestation is proof you can hand to your client — a dated, verifiable record of what the codebase actually does, not your word for it. They can check it themselves, against the same public rules anyone can read.